Remote FAAC TM3 868DS

Your remote FAAC TM3 868DS

is no longer produced by the manufacturer:
replaced by
FAAC TM2 868DS (100% compatible)

Shipping

Free postage
order 2 remotes

Your remote control TM3 868DS has been added to your cart

useful equipment for your remote control


Reference : : 787472

Our offers

  • Free support on +442033188218
  • Free programming support
  • Manual included in PDF format by email
  • 24 months warranty
  • Programming tutorial
All information concerning your replaced product (Remote control FAAC TM3 868DS) :
 Free postage order 2 remotes
14 days to change your mind
Free advice when buying and programming
Secure payment

 Secure payment

Cheaper and compatible remote
HR A868F4
HR A868F4
View this remote
Attention :
Please make sure you have the original remote control in operational condition if you order this compatible model: programming will be done by a teach-in method.
Brand FAAC
Model TM3 868DS
Référence fournisseur 787472
Frequency 868.35 MHz
Number of buttons 3
Type of programming 12 Switch
Type of battery 12V(23A)
Dimensions 9 x 11 x 3 cm
Battery and instructions included Yes
Please note: please do not confuse this extremely rare model (frequency of 868 MHz) with the similar-looking but much more widespread model FAAC 433 DS-3 (frequency of 433 MHz, also available on our site). The frequency should be written on the back or on the quartz in the inside of the remote control (TM433 for the model 433DS-3, otherwise TM868DS). Remote controls with different frequencies are not compatible.
Alan 03/10/2008

« I ordered a three button remote control over your website and I gave the correct part number but a three button remote control with a different part number was sent to me. I was asked to try and use it by a member of your staff but it did not work and it was returned to you. My credit card was duly credited with the amount paid for which I am grateful. In the meantime, I purchased the correct remote control from FAAC directly at a much reduced price. So altogether my experience of using your service was not good. »